Greenhouse vs Workable
A detailed side-by-side comparison of two popular recruiting & hiring tools to help you make the right choice.
Greenhouse
Structured hiring platform with AI-powered recruiting tools
★★★★★ 4.6/5
Pricing: paid from $6,000/yr
Full Review →Workable
AI-powered recruiting and HR software for growing companies
★★★★☆ 4.4/5
Pricing: paid from $149/mo
Full Review →Side-by-Side Comparison
| Criteria | Greenhouse | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.6/5 | ★ 4.4/5 |
| Pricing Model | paid from $6,000/yr | paid from $149/mo |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
The Verdict
Greenhouse edges ahead with a 4.6/5 rating compared to Workable's 4.4/5. However, Workable may be the better choice if you need ai candidate sourcing. Consider your team's specific recruiting & hiring needs before deciding.
Explore More
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Greenhouse better than Workable?
Greenhouse is rated 4.6/5 while Workable is rated 4.4/5. The best choice depends on your specific needs — Greenhouse excels at ai candidate sourcing, while Workable is known for ai candidate sourcing.
Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or Workable?
Greenhouse uses a paid pricing model starting at $6,000/yr. Workable uses a paid model starting at $149/mo. Compare both for the best value.
What are the main differences between Greenhouse and Workable?
Greenhouse focuses on ai candidate sourcing and structured interview kits, while Workable emphasizes ai candidate sourcing and 200+ job board posting. Both are Recruiting & Hiring tools but serve slightly different use cases.